Ren   Coelho. 
             The speed of Time has kept accelerating, (Paul Virilio).
                Time is without doubt the most essential element in 
              the universe. Everything that happens only happens because we measure 
              it against the yardstick of time. It is our awareness of time, our 
              ability to perceive its significance in relation to our lives that 
              lies at the heart of our human condition. As our understanding of 
              nature has continuously altered throughout history, so the very 
              concept of time has undergone many changes. A 'second' must have 
              meant a very different thing to Aristoteles compared to what it 
              means to us today. Unless an objective comparison can be made, a 
              second remains an abstract and utterly relative idea, irrelevant 
              perhaps to the classical mind, while it may be tangible to us now. 
              It is obvious that our understanding of time is closely linked 
              to the technological developments that allow us to quantify time 
              in ever smaller (or larger) units and to organize our sense of reality 
              around it.
              But time is not merely a relative physical entity, measured on 
              an atomic clock. It can be any number of things. Once we speak to 
              an astronomer, a psychologist, a biologist, a historian, or to the 
              man running to catch his train, the gamut of possibilities for perceiving 
              timeframes opens up. 
              From the perspective of the individual, time is a highly subjective 
              experience. And, as such, it has always been at the centre of the 
              artist's fascination. Whether it was in the stretched time of tragedy, 
              in the allegorical allusion to it in painting, or in musical form, 
              by giving shape to its measurement, through the ages artists have 
              reflected upon the nature of time.
              But to make use of time itself as a tool for artistic expression 
              may arguably have begun with the invention of the printing press. 
              A writer or a poet was now able to share his imagination with the 
              reader on a large scale. This reader would spend a certain amount 
              of time, determined and moulded by the artist. He would enter into 
              a reality that only comes into existence through the intermediary 
              device of the book. Seen from this angle, the technology of printing 
              was the benchmark invention that started a whole process. 
              It led us into the world of contemporary dynamic media, such as 
              film, video and computing, and their artistic use as a timebased 
              medium for expression.
            
 IMAGO 
              In my previous exhibition, IMAGO, findesi cle in Dutch 
              Contemporary Art, some very clear examples illustrated the fascinating 
              contributions that time based arts have made to the visual arts. 
              Ricardo F glistahler's PANTA RHEI (Everything Flows), showed 
              slowly passing clouds on two small monitors, built into an archaic 
              lead sculpture, while every second a drop of water fell from a funnel 
              onto a granite block. A hole in the stone, apparently caused by 
              the dripping water, underlined the power of time.  
              In POMPE, Boris Gerrets used the allusion to the ancient city to 
              create a metaphor for frozen time. On a twoscreen animation video, 
              he then reconstructed the place as a mental space in which reality 
              only interferes as death. At the supreme moment of the narrative, 
              our attention was violently drawn away from the screen to two death 
              masks on the wall, which we were not able to see before. 
              Bert Schutter's MILL x MOLEN showed a sculpture, consisting of a 
              metal frame containing twelve video monitors in the shape of a Dutch 
              windmill. On the screens, the sails of the mill flashed by, displaying 
              the contrast between static form and dynamic content. 
              But, without any doubt, the most lucid and poetic, illustration 
              of an artist using time as plastic material was Bill Spinhoven's 
              ALBERT'S ARK. On top of a sculpture, resembling both a medieval 
              sundial and a futuristic spaceship, a small video camera was mounted. 
              On a video monitor hidden in the sculpture, the spectator saw his 
              own image, distorted by means of a computer device, designed by 
              the artist himself, which he called The Time Stretcher. This instrument, 
              which stretched the space between the 625 lines that make up a (PAL)video 
              image, caused a time difference of roughly three seconds between 
              the top and the bottom of each image. In this manner, the viewer 
              was confronted with his own, gradually delayed, image and movement. 
              Thus, Spinhoven illustrated, rather elegantly, Einstein's Theory 
              of Relativity: bending time causes the deformation of the other 
              3 dimensions. 
             THE SECOND 
              Seven years after the IMAGO exhibition, I have seized the opportunity 
              to take a second look at the development of contemporary artists 
              who express their ideas through technological media. THE SECOND 
              consists of 17 timebased sculptures, created by 12, often young, 
              media artists. Once more we are confronted with a multitude of highly 
              original interpretations of and reflections on the nature of time 
              and the technologies that make use of it.
              As a central installation, in the exhibition there is Peter Bogers' 
              HEAVEN. In this work, time is referred 
              to as absence. As a space can be defined either by what we do or 
              do not find in it, Bogers' work is about a subtraction of time elements 
              that add up to a tangible experience. In a small, completely empty, 
              whitewashed, 3room apartment, we encounter the remnants of the 
              life that was previously led in this house. On 17 small blackandwhite 
              monitors, we catch 17 glimpses (lasting one second each) of various, 
              haphazard, fragments of movement. Together, they display domestic 
              life: a door is moving in the draught, a cat snores in front of 
              an absent heater, a baby is at its mother's breast, curtains move 
              in the wind, a coffee cup is being stirred, a hand caresses a body 
              and, as an explanation of the reason why the needle got stuck on 
              the gramophone record, a fragment of a TV image, registered in a 
              studio during the Kobe earthquake. 
              Bogers' domestic microcosm continues in his work RETORICA. 
              In this case the subject is the interaction between father and child. 
              Short moments of communication between him and his son are sampled 
              and played back in such a manner that they create a reversal of 
              roles. Bogers' manipulation of image and sound reveals an unsuspected 
              potential.  
              Bogers magnifies a hidden dimension: another of his very personal 
              media sculptures, SACRIFICE, 
              display, on a large photo, a complicated setup in stark contrasts 
              with a tiny little 2"x3" image in a glass box that is the core of 
              the work. Through the magnifying glass we see only the artist's 
              mouth drinking the water of the very bathtub in which he is lying, 
              or is he perhaps drowning? Events that happen cannot be undone. 
               
              Perhaps the catastrophic view which Bogers displays in HEAVEN 
              is appeased in BOREALIS by Steina 
              Vasulka. For what is selfevident to man, may not be so once we 
              consider the thought within the perspective of the larger forces 
              that govern nature. Their cyclical character strips time of its 
              direction. BOREALIS consists of 
              4 vertically placed projection screens, on which, bymeans of a construction 
              of 2 video projectors and 2 sets of mirrors, 4 images are displayed. 
              The images show seascapes, filmed by the artist in Iceland, her 
              country of origin. The movement of the water, however, alternates 
              between forward and backward. The manipulation brings to mind the 
              idea of eternity, in which time is no more than an endless field 
              of flowing matter. 
              Another confusion of conflicting time/reality frames is created 
              by the irony of Bert Schutter's LES 
              BAIGNEUSES. The work alludes to the famous painting by Renoir. 
               
              Entering the space, the visitor is again confronted with the sound 
              of splashing water and giggling girls. As he walks in the direction 
              of the source of these sounds, he must go through the curved corridor 
              that leads to the projection screen. There, he is detected before 
              he ever reaches the screen. A sensor then tells the girls to flee 
              from the water, and as the spectator arrives at the screen, only 
              the images of an empty pond remain for him to see. This conceptual 
              work is a playful reversal of Schroedinger's Quantum Mechanical 
              Paradigm. Events only exist as long as they can be observed. Here, 
              the event is prevented from being observed. Ultimate beauty remains 
              fiction unless we create it within ourselves! 
              While in this work the spectator never gets to see the work, in 
              Bill Spinhoven's I/EYE, he never 
              escapes its gaze.  
              This seemingly simple piece has become an icon of interactive art. 
              The artist's eye fills the screen and follows every movement that 
              takes place in front of it. For the first time since Altamira, art 
              takes revenge for being looked at. As it looks back,we are being 
              caught in the vicious circle of identity. In another of Spinhoven's 
              works, THE LOGIC OF LIFE, he 
              elaborates on the psychological confusion caused by looking but 
              not knowing whatwe are actually looking at. A huge machine, remotely 
              resembling a film projector, is running smoothly at high speed. 
              As soon as the light in the space is reduced, the machine remains 
              lit by a number of computercontrolled LEDs that vary in frequency. 
              The machine appears to run in a seemingly illogical manner. Various 
              times and speeds run amok, backwards and forwards apparently just 
              for the purpose of projecting images of the artist attempting to 
              fly. His fascination for mechanics is shared by Fiona Tan. 
              Her piece, WITNESS, consists of 
              a mechanical piece of clockwork in which the weights have been replaced 
              by 5 monitors of various dimensions, each representing a time element: 
              a day, an hour, a minute, a second and a frame (1/25th of a second). 
               
              Images are displayed on the monitors, which illustrate these particular 
              time elements, underlining the subjectivity of time. During the 
              day, these weights gradually lower until, at the end of the day, 
              they will have to be hoisted up again. Her use of the metaphor of 
              the clock brings to mind the allegorical representations in which 
              the hourglass used to indicate the fate of the flesh. This aspect 
              comes into view in another of her works, ATLAS 
              OF THE INTERIOR. 
              While browsing through the Internet, she came across the images 
              of 1700 deepfrozen slices of a human body. It appeared to be the 
              body of the murderer Joseph Jernigan, who, on being sentenced to 
              death, had donated his body to medical science. In this installation, 
              the visitor is requested to wear one of the white coats available. 
              The body is reconstructed on two monitors, while images of the slices 
              are projected onto the visitor's white coat. Reflective texts, spoken 
              by the artist, accompany the confrontation with this peculiar case 
              of recycling.
              THE SKIPPING MIND by Bea 
              de Visser is also a work that attempts to reconstruct, or rather 
              reanimat, a reality that belongs to the past. The installation 
              consists of two parts. Part one is a combination of 25 painted portraits. 
              The portraits are painted after a series of photos of an anonymous 
              woman which Visser found in an old book in a market in Prague. After 
              having brought these faces onto the canvas, de Visser digitized 
              the paintings and used a 'morphing' programme to put the image into 
              motion. The result is shown in the adjacent space where a projected 
              image revives someone who has longsince disappeared. You can sense 
              her endearing and nostalgic connection with this anonymous person 
              whose virtual face vacillates between reality and fiction. It is 
              almost as if time has a face. 
              FACE SHOPPING by A.P. Komen 
              shows a very different rendering of the human face. On four, 2x3 
              meter, adjacent projection screens, four closeups of young women 
              are shown. Each of the girls has a nervous 'tic'. As these images 
              are looping in fragments of a few seconds, these 'tics' become obsessive.They 
              are the many 'forgotten moments' of uncon scious behaviour that 
              reveal true emotional content. 
              The REANIMATIONS of Christiaan 
              Zwanikken are also erratically emotional, be it in a very different 
              way. In a fivepart installation, the remains of birds and other 
              animals are reanimated using microprocessors. The combination 
              of the evidentlypresent technology and the animal skulls, bones 
              and feathers, causes an ambiguous effect. Hilarious, but also rather 
              chilling. For the objects really seem to come back to life with 
              a great deal of movement and noise. 
              It is Kees Aafjes who most wittingly explores our problematic 
              relationship with (art)objects. As Aafjes sees it; an artist has 
              to call for attention and appreciation during all his whole life 
              in order to survive. To accentuate the irony of his view, the wingless 
              creature in FOUNDLING mumbles: 
              'Please, touch me', in a mixture of Spanish and Dutch. Whenever 
              a passerby responds to this request, the insect proclaims his satisfaction 
              in various degrees, to an almost organic level.  
              His CREDIT ART is a pastiche 
              of a credit card machine. The visitor is invited to enter his card 
              in order to obtain a work of art. On a small screen on the side 
              of the machine, the buyer is then confronted with the demolition 
              of his 'flexible friend'. 
              Contemporary life has its pitfalls for the art viewer, but MARACAÏBO, 
              ships that pass in the night by Pieter Baan Müller is an installation 
              in the best traditions of 20th century Dutch constructivist painting. 
              3 identical computer monitors are placed on pedestals. The left 
              and right monitor show only a monochrome rectangle, the left red, 
              the starboard light of a vessel, the right green, portside. On 
              the central monitor, a black (bottom) and grey (top) horizontal 
              rectangle represent, respectively, the ocean and the sky, with the 
              horizon separating the two in the centre. The image is moving up 
              and down, suggesting the rolling movement of the sea. From time 
              to time, the screen in the centre is blanked by flashes from the 
              lighthouse at Maracaïbo. At random, the centre screen changes 
              radically and is filled with the image of the hull of a passing 
              red ship. This impression is created by a simple diagonal streak. 
              As Mondriaan could evoke the hustle and bustle of New York streets 
              in his Boogy Woogy paintings by placing a few yellow squares on 
              a canvas, here, too, a whole world of content is revealed through 
              the dramatic use of primary forms and colours. 
              Another more sculptural use of form is applied by Jaap de Jonge. 
              In O.T.S., he displays 28 crystal 
              balls in an octagonal showcase. We could be looking into the future! 
              Each one shows a video by a different Dutch artist. To a certain 
              degree, de Jonge abandons his individual stance as artist and creates 
              in his work a public place, a medium for the expression of others. 
              In a world of ever more technological media interaction, this is 
              perhaps where we are heading. 
              I would like to conclude this personal rerview of timebased artworks 
              with TIME/PIECE by Boris Gerrets. 
              In a way, this piece is a monument to time: time as a paradox, time 
              as a succession of fractions of reality, time as the astronomical 
              entity governing nature. A small monitor is mounted inside a bronze 
              construction, the kind we know from sundials or globes. It carries 
              an inscription that reads Time is the mobile image of immobile eternity 
              (a quote from Augustinus). We are unable to decipher the nervous 
              image displayed on the monitor: what we can see is a rapid (1/50th 
              second) sequence of stacked images. But when we approach the piece, 
              the monitor starts revolving. Gradually, a single image appears 
              stretching over the circumference of the globe. The movement of 
              the monitor makes the images fan out over the whole circle of its 
              trajectory.  
              Now it shows the development of time laterally instead of punctually. 
              The revolving monitor displays a series of urban scenes, people 
              and cars moving about in a strange unrealistic manner. They belong 
              to the past but are oddly present in their stroboscopic three dimensionality. 
              We can move around the piece ourselves and discover different aspects 
              of the panorama. The work defines time as interaction between conflicting 
              movements, which result in the creation of space: the movement inside 
              the image, that of the image itself, the movement of the spectator 
              perceiving it, and the reference to the larger astronomical movement 
              in which he is caught.  
               
            |