Some of "La Nation's" staff made preparations to resume publication following the lifting of the ban. But on 19 October (1992), Algier's leading dailies carried a statement by five of "La Nation's" senior editorial staff, including the former editor Ammar Belhimer, to the effect that they were not prepared to work for "La Nation" even if it was to overcome funding problems and reappear in the streets.
Their statement condemned 'direct censorship in the form of a lengthy suspension at a crucial stage in the promotion and launching of the newspaper and indirect (through depriving it of all advertising, which is under monopoly control). The editorial was not aligned with any one political current, it said, but had 'the common desire to reestablish peace and harmony... and the will for co-existence among Algerians.' The statement claimed, as evidence of impartiality, that 'our newspaper was soon tagged as aligned with all three fronts the FIS (Islamic Salvation Front), the FFS (Socialist Forces Front) and the FLN (National Liberation Front).'
On the government's campaign against 'terrorism,' the statement claimed that 'those in favour of dialogue and reconciliation are insidiously transformed into accomplices of the terrorists.' As a vicious circle of violence overtakes the country, it said, 'the only line that is tolerated editorially and in news coverage is unconditional support for government action.'"
Source: Eileen Byrne, Index on Censorship, "Dialogue Suspended", 2/ 1993, Pgs. 21-23